I wonder how quick is cursor without hold.
I have a data set with 10^7 rows.
*begin;
declare mycursor cursor for select * from z;
commit;
* - this takes 3 ms.
*begin;
declare mycursor cursor with hold for select * from z;
commit;
* - this takes 3 s.
Thus, holdable cursor is getting calculated, obviously.
I cannot use cursor without hold as it requires a connection per query +
client.
But I also don't understand - why cursor with hold should start so much
longer than cursor without hold.
If there any possiblity to have a cursor that as fast as cursor without hold
and as transaction-independent as cursor with hold ?
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-to-create-a-cursor-that-is-independent-of-transactions-and-doesn-t-calculated-when-created-tp5762401.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
