Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> #1 issue I have with current matview functionality is locking.
> currently refresh takes out an access exclusive lock. so,
> question is, do you think your proposal will be such that it will
> no longer require taking out full lock for refresh purposes
> (either incremental or otherwise)?
The right thread for *that* question is "Differential
(transactional) REFRESH"; however, I might as well say here that I
don't think we want to get rid of the (faster) version that just
replaces the current heap when we add the (slower) option to
REFRESH it transactionally.
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
