Re: commit fest schedule for 9.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: commit fest schedule for 9.4
Date
Msg-id 1368501237.420.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commit fest schedule for 9.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: commit fest schedule for 9.4  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 22:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > In the last two years, the first commit fest started in June, which is
> > about a month from now.  If we are going to do that again, we should
> > clarify that as soon as possible.  And if we are not, then we should
> > also clarify that, because some people are probably expecting that we
> > are.
> 
> > So, any thoughts on the commit fest schedule, any need for deviations,
> > or same old?
> 
> Usually this is settled at the PGCon developers' meeting ...

But it doesn't have to, does it?

If there is nothing to change then we might as well settle it here and
save the meeting for more interesting things.  But if someone wants to
argue for adjustments, it'd be better to collect arguments here rather
than argue all of it out in 15 mins or so without any preparation.

(The same goes for all agenda items in that meeting.  At one point there
was a guideline to discuss items on the mailing list before the
meeting.)





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Better handling of archive_command problems