Re: automating pg_config.h.win32 maintenance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: automating pg_config.h.win32 maintenance
Date
Msg-id 1361e2a4-327c-78d2-40bf-027891c88982@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: automating pg_config.h.win32 maintenance  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: automating pg_config.h.win32 maintenance  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-12-19 08:49, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:31:05AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2019-12-19 04:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> This part needs a comment.  Like it is the equivalent of what
>>> src/common/'s Makefile does or something like that?
>>
>> This was meant to be addressed by
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6e457870-cef5-5f1d-b57c-fc89cfb8a788%402ndquadrant.com>,
>> but that discussion has not concluded yet.  Perhaps it makes more sense in
>> this context.
> 
> Hmm.  Your patch does not really change the generation of
> VAL_CONFIGURE in pg_config.h, so I am not sure that this other thread
> is an actual barrier for the improvement discussed here.  I would be
> actually fine to just remove the XXX and still use GetFakeConfigure()
> with VAL_CONFIGURE for now.  It would be a good thing to get rid of
> pg_config.h.win32 definitely.

committed with that comment removed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions