Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> On Jun 24, 2010, at 16:45 , Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think the existing names are fine - people should understand that
>> "options" means "server-side options" and that anything else is a
>> client-side option. However, if there's a strong consensus the other
>> way and someone feels like working up a patch, that's fine too.
> I'd volunteer to create the patch if people think renaming the libpq options is a good idea.
I'm with Robert: the names are fine as-is. We've not had complaints
about the libpq SSL parameters being confusingly like server-side SSL
parameters, for instance.
It might be a good idea to add a sentence to the documentation, though,
just pointing out that these control client-side keepalive probes rather
than server-side.
regards, tom lane
