Re: not(t_xmax = 0) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alejandro Carrillo
Subject Re: not(t_xmax = 0)
Date
Msg-id 1358732176.67313.YahooMailNeo@web172206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: not(t_xmax = 0)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
this function didn't work to know if a row can surely dead?

http://doxygen.postgresql.org/tqual_8c_source.html#l01236


De: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Para: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@mail.com>
CC: Alejandro Carrillo <fasterzip@yahoo.es>; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Enviado: Domingo 20 de enero de 2013 15:30
Asunto: Re: [GENERAL] not(t_xmax = 0)

"Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn@mail.com> writes:
> Alejandro Carrillo wrote:
>> I try to do a function that let know which rows are deleted in a
>> table using the xmax !=0

> That's not something you're going to have much luck with by using
> plpgsql to try to parse heap pages.

No, because xmax being nonzero doesn't prove much: the row might be
updated/deleted, or it might only have been locked by SELECT FOR UPDATE,
or it might be perfectly fine because the updating transaction rolled
back.  You could get a limited amount of information by checking the
hint bits in t_infomask, but if the hint bits aren't set you won't know
what the row's state is.

You'd really need to do this in C using the tqual.c functions for the
results to be trustworthy.

I'm a bit surprised that contrib/pageinspect doesn't have a mechanism
for pulling out only committed-good heap tuples...

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Understanding TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Overly strict casting rules? (was: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage)