Re: about yum.postgresql.org - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Devrim GÜNDÜZ |
---|---|
Subject | Re: about yum.postgresql.org |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1341263547.2177.36.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | about yum.postgresql.org (Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Responses |
Re: about yum.postgresql.org
Re: about yum.postgresql.org |
List | pgsql-www |
Hi, On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 18:43 +0200, Cédric Villemain wrote: <snip> > I believe it needs at least one for the NEWS (new build, fix, etc...) > and for bug-report. http://svn.pgrpms.org/browser http://wiki.pgrpms.org/report You can use the former one to track updates that are in the queue, the second one for the bug reports and the progress. I got a set of emails from you and other folks last week, but, per: http://wiki.pgrpms.org/wiki/PackageUpdatePolicies I intend to reply them this week. > Debian stuff got one: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-pkg-debian/ > > Can we consider http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-pkg-yum/ ? Good idea, +1. > I would also like to see the maintenance team of those packages been > extended, I believe Devrim is alone, which is not 'safe' (what > happens if Devrim is in holidays *without* internet, ... ok it is > *rare*, but still). Well, there are two separate processes in here: * Updating the spec file : I'm all for adding new people, who have provided high quality patches so far. However, my experience has not been that nice -- some people either tried to break packaging policies of Fedora/Red Hat, some people tried to change the packaging layout based on their personal/company/customer requirements. IIRC we have Fetter and Magnus as the alternative committers in here, but I'm too lazy to check it now. AFAIK, we don't have many Fedora packagers in the community, except me and Tom (please feel to smack me if I am missing someone else). Having some community packaging experience is strictly what I personally am looking for, if I am in charge of adding new people in here. * Building packages: This requires extra permissions, extra caution, extra experience. This process is half-automate, which is intended, because we need a human *at least* to sign the packages (and check the build status). This also requires access to a community machine, so that probably something that our sysadmin team will also need to decide -- What if I decide to quit or die? No idea, but I believe the process is more or less documented somewhere (sysadmins?), so someone can pick up the packaging. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz