Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date
Msg-id 13392.1220879465@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  ("Greg Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I'm all for using the correct acronyms in all messages and documentation. What
> I find annoying is the:

> postgres=# set work_mem = '1g';
> ERROR: invalid value for parameter "work_mem": "1g"

But of course case insensitivity isn't going to fix that example for you.
So we're right back at the question of where we should draw the line in
trying to accept variant input.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Some newbie questions