Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date
Msg-id efd7a2a239337acbe33ae74b8b92dd31@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Tom Lane wrote:
> My vote is to reject the patch and work on a config checker.

+1

> postgres=# set work_mem = '1g';
> ERROR: invalid value for parameter "work_mem": "1g"

Perhaps this would be a great place for a HINT listing all
valid inputs, if not there already?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809081014
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkjFM2AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiDvACdE6Wlrnu3uQH4mOpuEMvX0VQe
rXoAoPLCR5jKTWQH4GsHDtz5NNZXq4vA
=nRMS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code