Re: Executing inet_server_addr/port() in parallel workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Executing inet_server_addr/port() in parallel workers
Date
Msg-id 1336801.1610573063@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Executing inet_server_addr/port() in parallel workers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Executing inet_server_addr/port() in parallel workers  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Having said that, I'm fine with the idea of just marking these
> parallel-restricted in HEAD and ignoring the problem in the back
> branches.

Hearing no complaints, done that way.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: automatic analyze: readahead - add "IO read time" log message
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other