On ons, 2012-04-25 at 23:02 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> As far as I can tell, postgresql has the following object-relational
> features:
> (1) OIDs
> (2) Inheritance
> (3) Dot function call syntax
I think having composite types and functions using them also belongs
there.
> Given all this, why do we still call postgres an object-relational
> system (in the first sentence of our "About" page)?
I think it's still a good mission statement of sorts, even if most
people don't use all the features.
