Re: ambuild parameters - Mailing list pgsql-general

From david.hoksza@seznam.cz
Subject Re: ambuild parameters
Date
Msg-id 133318512.20060320080215@seznam.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to ambuild parameters  (david.hoksza@seznam.cz)
Responses Re: ambuild parameters
List pgsql-general
Thanks for answering, it was a good guess, I really didn't mark it,
but unfortunately it didn't solve my problem. It still falls down,
when I try to access the argument.
But it seems strange to me, that converting to Relation is OK:

Relation index_rel = (Relation) PG_GETARG_POINTER(1);

and also that comparing to NULL is OK:

if (index_rel == NULL).

Obviously the problem comes, when touching inside the structure in
RelationGetNumberOfBlocks.

I'm running it on Windows XP, but i guess that should be no problem in
this case?
Don't you have possibly any other ideas? I'm implementing a framework
for indexing into PG as my diploma work, so it's quite importatnt to
me...

Thanks,
       David Hoksza

________________________________
19. března 2006, 22:43:48, napsal jste:

TL> david.hoksza@seznam.cz writes:
>> Hi, I'm trying to implement my own access method. Now I've implemented
>> and compiled it but I've problems when I try to use it.

TL> Wild guess: did you mark all your functions as V1 call convention?
TL> The internal functions don't need to be marked, but dynamically loaded
TL> ones do.

TL>                         regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Ang Chin Han"
Date:
Subject: Re: OpenSuse10.0 and postgresql
Next
From: Dragan Matic
Date:
Subject: vacuum full taking much longer than dump + restore?