On tor, 2012-03-08 at 10:49 +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Actually, I did when I reviewed the patch the first time round.
> I think that the checks implemented are clearly good and useful,
> since any problem reported will lead to an error at runtime if
> a certain code path in the function is taken.
Shouldn't the validator just reject the function in those cases?
