Re: static or dynamic libpgport - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: static or dynamic libpgport
Date
Msg-id 1323719366.20924.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: static or dynamic libpgport  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: static or dynamic libpgport
List pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2011-12-10 at 20:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The other 
> > thing is we'd need to turn on flags that make the object suitable for a 
> > dynamic library (e.g. -fpic).
> 
> Right now, libpq laboriously rebuilds all the .o files it needs from
> src/port/ so as to get them with -fpic.  It would be nice if we could
> clean that up while we're doing this.  It might be all right to always
> build the client-side version of libpgport with -fpic, though I'd be sad
> if that leaked into the server-side build.

So would we continue to build the client binaries (psql, pg_dump, etc.)
against the static libpgport.a, thus keeping it "invisible" there, or
would we dynamically link them, thus creating a new dependency.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for type privileges