Re: synchronized snapshots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: synchronized snapshots
Date
Msg-id 1313564381.19987.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: synchronized snapshots  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: synchronized snapshots
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-08-16 at 20:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In fact, now that I think about it, setting the transaction snapshot
> from a utility statement would be functionally useful because then you
> could take locks beforehand.

Another issue is that in some client interfaces, BEGIN and COMMIT are
hidden behind API calls, which cannot easily be changed or equipped with
new parameters.  So in order to have this functionality available
through those interfaces, we'd need a separately callable command.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: A note about hash-based catcache invalidations
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build