Here's another small change to the patch, it works fine for me and it quite
saved my day.
I try to submit the patch by email.
diff --git a/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c b/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c
index f6e2a28..1f88d72 100644
--- a/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c
+++ b/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct _param char *pg_host; int verbose; int dry_run;
+ int transaction_limit;};int vacuumlo(char *, struct _param *);
@@ -286,6 +287,8 @@ vacuumlo(char *database, struct _param * param) } else deleted++;
+ if(param->transaction_limit!=0 &&
deleted>=param->transaction_limit)
+ break; } PQclear(res);
@@ -313,6 +316,7 @@ usage(const char *progname) printf(" -h HOSTNAME database server host or socket directory\n");
printf(" -n don't remove large objects, just show what would be
done\n"); printf(" -p PORT database server port\n");
+ printf(" -l LIMIT stop after removing LIMIT LOs\n"); printf(" -U USERNAME user name to connect as\n");
printf(" -w never prompt for password\n"); printf(" -W force password prompt\n");
@@ -342,6 +346,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) param.pg_port = NULL; param.verbose = 0; param.dry_run = 0;
+ param.transaction_limit = 0; if (argc > 1) {
@@ -359,7 +364,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) while (1) {
- c = getopt(argc, argv, "h:U:p:vnwW");
+ c = getopt(argc, argv, "h:U:p:l:vnwW"); if (c == -1) break;
@@ -395,6 +400,14 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) } param.pg_port = strdup(optarg);
break;
+ case 'l':
+ param.transaction_limit = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
+ if ((param.transaction_limit < 0) || (param.transaction_limit >
2147483647))
+ {
+ fprintf(stderr, "%s: invalid transaction limit number: %s, valid
range is form 0(disabled) to 2147483647.\n", progname, optarg);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ break; case 'h': param.pg_host = strdup(optarg); break;
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/vacuumlo-patch-tp4628522p4634026.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
