Re: Indexes not always used after inserts/updates/vacuum analyze - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Indexes not always used after inserts/updates/vacuum analyze
Date
Msg-id 13022.1014907866@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indexes not always used after inserts/updates/vacuum  (Reinhard Max <max@suse.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
Reinhard Max <max@suse.de> writes:
> I've just found a case where forcing indexscans results in much higher
> speed.

>         ->  Index Scan using foo_pkey on foo
>         (cost=0.00..25153.18 rows=352072 width=4)
>         (actual time=0.03..157.57 rows=38432 loops=1)

The major estimation error is evidently in this indexscan.  What
statistics does pg_stats show for this table?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Reinhard Max
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexes not always used after inserts/updates/vacuum
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexes not always used after inserts/updates/vacuum analyze