On tis, 2011-03-01 at 21:10 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> So you end up with a context message saying "PL/Python function %s"
> and a detail message with the saved detail (if it's present) *and* the
> traceback. The problem is that the name of the function is already in
> the traceback, so there's no need for the context *if* there's a
> traceback present.
I wouldn't actually worry about that bit of redundancy so much. Getting
proper context for nested calls is much more important.
