Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Date
Msg-id 12979.893961778@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes  (Phil Thompson <phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Phil Thompson <phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk> writes:
> I've misunderstood the protocol - and the protocol specification is
> therefore wrong (or at least incomplete) in this respect.  Do you want
> to fix the spec and include your enhancements or shall I?

Yes, there are some things I thought were wrong in the programmer's guide
chapter about the FE/BE protocol.  I'd be happy to submit revised text.

I haven't paid any attention yet to how the documentation is handled.
Is the stuff in the distribution under doc/src/sgml considered the
editable master text, or is it generated from some other format?
Do I need to subscribe to pgsql-docs to find out what to do? :-)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Thompson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Next
From: aldev@hotmail.com
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL HOWTO Version 6.0 released