El jue, 03-02-2011 a las 20:47 +0100, Pavel Stehule escribió:
> Hello
>
> If you use a record expansion over function's result, then function is
> called once for record's field.
>
> so don't do it on slow functions.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
> 2011/2/3 Gerardo Herzig <gherzig@fmed.uba.ar>:
> > Hi all, im using a function of my own in a subquery, and when wonderig
> > about the slowliness of this one, y relalize that:
> >
> > test=# SELECT (_xxfunction(854,'711H',11,false)).* ;
> > (4 filas)
> > --Result DELETED
> > Duración: 1069,465 ms
> >
> >
> > glyms=# SELECT * from _xxfunction(854,'711H',11,false) ;
> > (4 filas)
> > Duración: 228,699 ms
> >
> > For privacy reasons, i just deleted the result and the function name,
> > but the resulst are obviously exactly the same, and the ().* form (which
> > i needed) is taking so much more...there is a reason why? A workaround?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Gerardo
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
> >
>
Mmmmm ok Thanks...So there is no workaround/alternative to this?
Gerardo
