Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: dblink versus long connection strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From queej
Subject Re: dblink versus long connection strings
Date
Msg-id 1291046519378-3284620.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dblink versus long connection strings  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: dblink versus long connection strings
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
I have views that use the dblink(connStr text, sql text) call.  They cannot
use a two-step process.  So postgres 9.0 has broken all of those views.  Is
there a straightforward solution to this?
-- 
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/dblink-versus-long-connection-strings-tp3275575p3284620.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead