Re: IDLE in transaction introspection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Date
Msg-id 12869.1320954572@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IDLE in transaction introspection  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Well, we could use an optional "details" string for that.  If not, we
> are still using the magic-string approach, which I thought we didn't
> like.

No, we're not using magic strings, we're using an enum --- maybe not an
officially declared enum type, but it's a column with a predetermined
set of possible values.  It would be a magic string if it were still in
the "query" field and thus confusable with user-written queries.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: const correctness
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: const correctness