Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries
Date
Msg-id 12858.1496601058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I didn't want to optimize for it --- I wanted a way to detect when DROP
> EXTENSION has no hope of working, and give more details.  I assume the
> problem with that is the the object names are inside SQL scripts that
> cannot be easily interrogated.  Are the pg_proc entries tied to the
> extension in some verifiable way that we could identify orphaned pg_proc
> lines?

You could look for 'e'-type pg_depend entries.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries
Next
From: Beena Emerson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning