Re: git: uh-oh - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: git: uh-oh
Date
Msg-id 1282148903-sup-4514@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: git: uh-oh  (Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>)
Responses Re: git: uh-oh
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Michael Haggerty's message of mié ago 18 12:00:44 -0400 2010:

> 3. Run
> 
>     git filter-branch
> 
> This rewrites the commits using any parentage changes from the grafts
> file.  This changes most commits' SHA1 hashes.  After this you can
> discard the .git/info/grafts file.  You would then want to remove the
> original references, which were moved to "refs/original".

Hmm.  If I need to do two changes in the same branch, do I need to
mention the new SHA1 for the second one (after filter-branch changes its
SHA1), or the original one?  If the former, then this is going to be a
very painful process.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh