Hi Guilluame
On 19-Jan-07, at 8:26 AM, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 1/19/07, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
>> I've asked Guillaume to test this hypothesis with his test case that
>> does not use XA to see if the memory "leak" still exists without XA
>
> Perhaps I was not clear when I explained the remaining problem. I
> don't have any memory leak left. The attached file is a test case
> which shows the new problem.
You were exceptionally clear when you described the problem you are
now having. Apparently I have not been clear.
I don't believe the solution is for the result set to close the
unnamed portal when it is closed. As you can see there is a catch-22
situation which you described clearly.
I believe the problem is in the server's XA code somehow not closing
unnamed parameters properly.
If you could run the code I sent you and tell me if it causes a leak,
then that will confirm it.
Dave
>
> The commit is done before closing the resultset and so the close()
> method can't find the portal which results in an exception (the portal
> is closed on commit).
> It's probably not something we should do but before there was no error
> in this case and now it throws an exception which is not really clear
> for the end user:
> An exception has occured.ERROR: cursor "<unnamed portal 1>" does
> not exist
> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: cursor "<unnamed portal 1>"
> does not exist
>
> --
> Guillaume
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
