On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 17:43 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > So my proposal would be:
> >
> > wal_mode=crash/archive/standby
> > archive_mode=on/off # if on, wal_mode must be >= 'archive'
> > archive_command='command'
> > max_wal_senders=<integer> # if > 0, wal_mode must be >= 'archive'
>
> As a general design comment, I think we should avoid still having an
> archive_mode GUC but having it do something different. If we're going
> to change the semantics, we should also change the name, maybe to
> "archiving".
We don't need *both* wal_mode and archive_mode, since archive_mode
exists only to ensure that full WAL is written even when archive_command
= '' momentarily.
Should do this
> > wal_mode=crash/archive/standby
> > archive_command='command'
> > max_wal_senders=<integer> # if > 0, wal_mode must be >= 'archive'
and make wal_mode SIGHUP
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
