Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> My thought is that it needs some beta testing. �Perhaps it'd be sane to
>> push it into beta2 now, and then back-patch sometime after 9.1 final,
>> if no problems pop up.
> I think it'd be sensible to back-patch it. I'm not sure whether now
> or later. It's a bug fix that is biting real users in the field, so
> it seems like we ought to do something about it.
I don't deny it's a bug fix; I'm just dubious about the risk-reward
ratio. As to risk: the patch isn't trivial (notice Alvaro didn't get it
right the first time). As to reward: it's been like that since forever,
so if the problem were really serious, we'd have identified it before.
Letting it age a bit during beta would do a lot to damp down the risk
side of the equation.
regards, tom lane
