Re: PL/pgSQL caught exceptions leak memory? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL caught exceptions leak memory?
Date
Msg-id 12680.1140626554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to PL/pgSQL caught exceptions leak memory?  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> Caught exceptions in PL/pgSQL appear to leak memory -- is that
> expected?

This looks a bit messy :-(.  The problem is that if the controlled
statements within the BEGIN block leak any function-local memory
(ie, memory in the "SPI Proc" context of the plpgsql function), this
memory is not reclaimed before we continue execution of the function.

It seems almost impossible to guarantee that no such leaks will occur,
since we might be trying to catch an elog that could have been thrown
from anywhere.  The only practical fix is to run the controlled
statements in a sub-context that could be freed after the PG_CATCH.

The reason that the code currently tries to run the controlled
statements in the same context it was using is that all
pass-by-reference variable values get allocated in the current context.
If this context is thrown away then we'd have dangling pointers, eg
consider
declare x text;begin  ...  begin    x := some-expression;  exception    ... try to use value of x here ...

AFAICS, to make this work we'd have to modify plpgsql so that variable
values are stored in a separate sub-context distinct from what's used as
the "current memory context" while running statements.  This is gonna be
fairly invasive, I fear, and I'm worried about the performance cost of
extra copying too.

Any better ideas out there?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: windows / initdb oddness
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated email signature