Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date
Msg-id 1264782778.1360.4.camel@jd-desktop.iso-8859-1.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:56 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:

> I think we should extend the time available to make sure we have a
> sensible set of features for 9.0. The heat of this discussion tells me
> that we are going to be lacking features that are must-have to someone,
> whether or not they are in the majority.

-1

Missing release dates because of some patch that isn't done is something
the community has been trying to get away from, aggressively. The way
this is supposed to work is:

We have a release date Features that aren't going to make that date, don't.
We release


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings