> On 2021.04.16. 10:00 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:28:38PM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> > So, that gives information on two operators, and then gives one
> > example query for each. Clearly, the second example was meant to
> > illustrate a where-clause with the @? operator.
> >
> > Small change to prevent great confusion (I'll admit it took me far
> > too long to understand this).
>
> Once one guesses the definition of the table to use with the sample
> data at disposal in the docs, it is easy to see that both queries
> should return the same result, but the second one misses the shot and
> is corrected as you say. So, applied.
Great, thank you.
I just happened to use the website-documentation and noticed that there the change is not done: it still has the
erroneousline, in the docs of 13 (current), and 12; the docs of 14devel are apparently updated.
That makes me wonder: is there a regular html-docs-update (dayly? weekly?) of doc-bugs of this kind in the website-docs
ofcurrent and earlier releases?
To be clear, I am talking about the lines below:
'GIN index supports @@ and @? operators'
on pages
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype-json.html
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/datatype-json.html
where the change that was pushed was to correct the second example from @@ to @?
thanks,
Erik Rijkers
>
> My apologies for the delay.
> --
> Michael
