Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging
Date
Msg-id 1251145044.10096.20.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2009-08-21 at 20:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> As of SQL99 it's supposed to be legal if you're grouping by a primary key
> (or some other cases where the other columns can be proved functionally
> dependent on the grouping columns, but that's the most useful one).
> We haven't got round to implementing that, but I'm not sure that it
> would make the Drupal code work anyway.  Are they actually writing to
> spec here, or just doing whatever mysql will let them?
> 
> BTW, I was under the impression there already *was* a TODO entry about
> improving our standards compliance in this area.  I can't find it in
> the list right now, though.

I added "Add support for functional dependencies" just now, with a
comment how this relates to GROUP BY.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in date arithmetic
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in date arithmetic