On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 00:31 +0400, Sergey Samokhin wrote:
> Unfortunatelly there is one disadvantage coming with this solution
> which I don't like: features aimed to control reference integrity
> (like REFERENCES constraint) are no longer my friends.
>
> Is there a way that mixes the advantages (reference integrity + good
> performance) of those ones I listed above?
Table partitioning and table inheritance. See the manual and the list
archives.
--
Craig Ringer