Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Date
Msg-id 1250377323.9960.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2009-08-14 at 13:57 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Looking at the definitions of vacuum_freeze_min_age and
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age there seems to be almost no distinction
> between "min" and "max" in those two names.

For min, the action happens at or above the min values.  For max, the
action happens at or below the max value.

With those two particular parameters, the freezing happens exactly
between the min and the max value.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove tabs from SGML.