Re: Scanning for insert - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Scanning for insert
Date
Msg-id 12503.1141337046@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Scanning for insert  (James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>)
List pgsql-patches
James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name> writes:
> The problem with the AM no longer having the ability to make guarantees about
> lock/state duration seems more or less unavoidable with this two-step process.

So in other words, a two-step process is wrong.

> Besides that I think it's ready for review.

Don't think I really need to read any further ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_dump options: exclude tables/schemas, multiple
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2