Re: buildfarm + meson - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: buildfarm + meson
Date
Msg-id 124b4492-e4c9-2f7d-cd54-de09c05dbde5@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: buildfarm + meson  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: buildfarm + meson  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: buildfarm + meson  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 2023-03-09 Th 08:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote:



At this stage I think I'm prepared to turn this loose on a couple of my buildfarm animals, and if nothing goes awry for the remainder of the month merge the dev/meson branch and push a new release.

There is still probably a little polishing to do, especially w.r.t. log file artefacts.





A few things I've found:

. We don't appear to have an equivalent of the headerscheck and cpluspluscheck GNUmakefile targets

. I don't know how to build other docs targets (e.g. postgres-US.pdf)

. There appears to be some mismatch in database names (e.g. regression_dblink vs contrib_regression_dblink). That's going to cause some issues with the module that adjusts things for cross version upgrade.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Disable rdns for Kerberos tests