Re: buildfarm + meson - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: buildfarm + meson
Date
Msg-id 7bb8b8a5-5297-ab3c-3412-466fd0124d00@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: buildfarm + meson  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: buildfarm + meson
List pgsql-hackers


On 2023-03-09 Th 14:47, Andrew Dunstan wrote:


On 2023-03-09 Th 08:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote:



At this stage I think I'm prepared to turn this loose on a couple of my buildfarm animals, and if nothing goes awry for the remainder of the month merge the dev/meson branch and push a new release.

There is still probably a little polishing to do, especially w.r.t. log file artefacts.





A few things I've found:

. We don't appear to have an equivalent of the headerscheck and cpluspluscheck GNUmakefile targets

. I don't know how to build other docs targets (e.g. postgres-US.pdf)

. There appears to be some mismatch in database names (e.g. regression_dblink vs contrib_regression_dblink). That's going to cause some issues with the module that adjusts things for cross version upgrade.




Another thing: the test for uuid.h is too strict. On Fedora 36 the OSSP header is in /usr/include, not /usr/include/ossp (I got around that for now by symlinking it, but obviously that's a nasty hack we can't ask people to do)


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: improving user.c error messages