On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 19:50 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> >
> >> FYI, my view is that we should include any training events in which
> >> PostgreSQL is a part of the technology stack and will be used directly
> >> in some way. It helps show the visitors to our site the diverse range
> >> of activities and applications in use around the project. If you see
> >> what I mean :-)
> >
> > Oh. I just bounced a Postgres Plus Advanced Server training submission
> > from the website based on the policy. Should I not have done so?
>
> Well for obvious reasons I'd like to say yes, but PPAS != PostgreSQL,
> which is what the policy requires the training be related to.
>
> That said - Postgres Plus Standard Server *is* pure PostgreSQL (plus a
> bunch of useful add-ons like Slony, PostGIS etc), so I don't think
> PPSS training should be bounced, should it be posted.
>
> > What's our stance on training/events/news for forked versions?
>
> I would say no to forks, but yes to alternate distros.
Where does Mammoth fall as it is Open Source?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
