Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file
Date
Msg-id 1242396642.3843.754.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 22:56 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:

> OK, I probably understood your point. The timeline history files whose
> timeline ID is larger than that of an oldest backup must not be deleted
> from the archive. On the other hand, the smaller or equal one can be
> deleted. Not all history files are necessary. So, if we don't keep older
> backup, we probably can delete all files in the archive before
> pg_start_backup().
> Is my understanding right?

Heikki is right in one sense: if you do pg_start_backup() then for
*that* backup you do not need earlier files. 

However, as you have pointed out, if you have *multiple* backups then
deleting history files may cause problems with an earlier backup.

It's standard practice to have >1 backup, so there is potential for
error and minimum is we must document that. 

Rather than explaining the problem and the rules by which we can work
out exactly which history files to keep, I think it is safer to say that
we must keep all history files.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file