Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Date
Msg-id 1236710661.19111.60.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> It was said upthread that SEPostgres is already packaged for Fedora.
> 

> You're just putting the hard decision onto packagers, who have no more
> knowledge than you do about what their users want, and (probably)
> considerably less understanding of the benefits/risks of some new
> configure option they happen to notice.

Which is exactly why we have two types of RPMS, --integer-datetimes and
not. We would do the same thing with SE-Postgres.

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org  Consulting, Development, Support, Training  503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)