Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Date
Msg-id 1236713134.3444.32.camel@laptop-hp.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:44 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> We would do the same thing with SE-Postgres.

No, no. I already experienced this with --integer-datetimes sets, and I
don't ever want to maintain another set. It is horrible.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr                  http://www.gunduz.org

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Next
From: Stefan Moeding
Date:
Subject: Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres