Re: pg_upgrade project status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zdenek Kotala
Subject Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date
Msg-id 1233082625.1475.17.camel@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade project status  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade project status  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander píše v út 27. 01. 2009 v 15:54 +0100:

> 
> I have a hard time thinking that we'll have wasted a lot of time on
> first doing a perl implementation if we have to rewrite it in C later.
> The other way around would be a waste though. The amount of time spent
> on the perl implementation I expect to be a *lot* less than the
> combination of thinking up the *way* to do it in general and the C
> implementation time.

Agree with Magnus. I'm happy with korn shell for now :-). And we need
better solution anyway for future releases. Current approach does not
support e.g. dropped column. 
    Zdenek



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Next
From: Joshua Brindle
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning