On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 12:51 -0700, Gregory Williamson wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
> <...>
> > I actually mentioned pgPool II to my boss earlier, and it's
> something we
> > will have to seriously consider, but will have to do some research
> first.
>
> We had an application ported from Informix which initially required
> 1000+ connections to handle peak load (one of 4 servers pushed by two
> application servers doing spatial queries).
>
> Using pgPool means we have a max limit of 100 and have almost never
> gone near it -- usually we have 12-25 connections at once and load and
> throughput are higher than they were before.
Not to disparage pgPool, but we have also had great results with
pgBouncer.
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997