David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 05:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> How is this even a little bit sane?
> I don't think it is. I've not looked in detail yet, but I think we
> might be able to do something in check_output_expressions() so that we
> track the targetIsInAllPartitionLists() separately. Maybe
> unsafeColumns[] needs to become an enum type that has UNSAFE, SAFE,
> WINDOW_RUNCONDITION_ONLY and then change things so we never make a
> runCondition when the qual is UNSAFE.
> Anyway, I'll give it more thought and aim to come up with a patch
> early next week.
Why can't we simply *remove* all this logic from subquery pushdown?
I would expect that what happens in useful cases is that we push down
the (safe) qual and then during planning of the subquery we see a WHERE
clause matching the window run condition and work with that. So this
all seems redundant, quite aside from being faulty.
regards, tom lane
