Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods
Date
Msg-id 12233.1162355641@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods  ("Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>)
Responses Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods
List pgsql-hackers
"Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov> writes:
> I notice that all the  
> authentication (pg_fe_sendauth()) is done inside PWConnectPoll(),  
> which sounds like something that isn't expected to block on network  
> access.

That's right.

> Is this behavior important during startup?

You needn't bother to submit a patch that breaks it ;-).  But I don't
really see that it's such a big deal.  You just need some state data to
keep track of what to do the next time you receive a message.  There's
no assumption anywhere that authentication only involves one message
exchange.

> I haven't looked at the corresponding logic on the server side, but  
> I'd assume that it forks before we get to this point so it doesn't  
> matter.

Correct, we don't need to worry about multitasking apps there.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Index greater than 8k
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Index greater than 8k