Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord
Date
Msg-id 1221739743.3913.2393.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord  (Greg Stark <greg.stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:40 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:

> Why bit just add a new bitfield for flags if we need them? I'm usually  
> the one worried about data density so perhaps I should be on the other  
> side of the fence here but I'm not sure. The conventional wisdom is  
> that wal bandwidth is not a major issue.

In some cases, but my wish is also to minimise WAL volume as much as
possible.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: FSM patch - performance test
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: optimizing CleanupTempFiles