Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert
Date
Msg-id 1214808396.3845.434.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > In cases where we know we will assign a real xid, can we just skip the
> > assignment of the virtual xid completely?
> 
> Even if we could do this I doubt it would be a good idea.  It'd destroy
> the invariant that all transactions have a vxid, which at the very least
> would create naming problems.

Ahh, no, I meant go straight to assigning a real xid, to avoid the
wasted effort in inserting a vxid *and* a real xid.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: A new take on the foot-gun meme
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: VirtualXactLockTableInsert