Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> * Allow row re-use without vacuum (Tom)
> Well, a name doesn't mean someone claimed it but rather the _expert_ on
> the item. I added this item assuming it was going to be accomplished
> with some type of auto-vacuum. I will clearify it to mention
> auto-vacuum, if that is OK.
"Clarify"? How about "replace completely"?
* Provide automatic scheduling of background vacuum
Still not sure that I'd classify it as URGENT.
regards, tom lane
