Re: [PATCHES] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 12:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I see this as being basically another cost parameter, and as such
> I don't think it needs more documentation than any of those have.
> (Now admittedly you could argue that they could all use a ton more
> documentation than they now have, but it's not reasonable to insist
> on just this one meeting a different standard.)

OK, if that's the view then the patch is ready for commit, AFAICS.

--
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com