Re: Solaris Performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Solaris Performance
Date
Msg-id 12095.1012855390@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Solaris Performance  ("P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero@sonalysts.com>)
Responses Re: Solaris Performance  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
"P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero@sonalysts.com> writes:
> We've been running equivalent configurations and schema on
> HP-UX, Solaris, and x86 Linux, and benchmarking with
> pgbench and some application-specific data.  All testing
> was with 7.2rc2, and all were built natively on each platform.

> Performance on Solaris (2.6 and 2.7) seems lackluster,

Seeing as how those are three different hardware platforms, one must
wonder how sure you are that you are comparing apples to apples.
A difference in CPU speed or disk speed could explain everything.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Long column names and table names
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance