AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Subject AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date
Msg-id 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368252@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
> For a log file on a busy system, this could improve throughput a lot--batch
> commit.  You end up with fewer than one fsync() per transaction.

This is not the issue, since that is already implemented.
The current bunching method might have room for improvement, but
there are currently fewer fsync's than transactions when appropriate.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Doug McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: Re[4]: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re[4]: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC